Trump administration

When looking at the Trump administration, the period from 2017 to 2021 when Donald Trump held the U.S. presidency, marked by rapid policy shifts and intense public debate. Also known as Donald Trump's presidency, it redefined executive action on trade, health, and security. The era is closely tied to US immigration policy, stricter border enforcement and travel bans, tax reform, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that lowered corporate rates, and foreign policy, a “America First” stance that reshaped trade deals and alliances. Understanding these pieces helps make sense of the headlines you’ll see below.

Major policy pillars

The Trump administration leaned on three pillars that show up across many news stories: immigration, taxes, and foreign affairs. First, the immigration pillar pushed for tighter border controls, the construction of a wall along the southern border, and travel bans targeting several countries. This approach not only sparked legal battles but also changed how the Department of Homeland Security operates daily. Second, tax reform aimed to boost business investment by cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and providing individual tax cuts, which sparked debates on income inequality and the federal deficit. Third, foreign policy switched from multilateral cooperation to bilateral negotiations, leading to new trade agreements like the US‑Mexico‑Canada Agreement (USMCA) and a tougher stance on China and Iran.

Immigration policy under the Trump administration created ripple effects in labor markets and state budgets. States near the border experienced shifts in school enrollment numbers and law‑enforcement resources. Meanwhile, the policy’s emphasis on merit‑based visas altered the composition of skilled workers in tech hubs such as Nairobi and Johannesburg, showing how a U.S. policy can influence talent flows across Africa.

Tax reform reshaped the fiscal landscape for both corporations and individuals. Companies reported higher after‑tax earnings, which in turn drove stock‑market optimism for a time. However, the reduction in revenue forced the Treasury to rely more on borrowing, contributing to a growing national debt that affected long‑term fiscal planning. For everyday taxpayers, the changes meant lower headline rates but also the removal of certain deductions, a mix that sparked varied reactions in households across the continent.

On the foreign policy front, the “America First” doctrine led to renegotiated trade deals, heightened tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, and the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear agreement. These moves prompted reactions from allies and rivals alike and set the stage for new diplomatic dynamics in regions such as the Middle East and Sub‑Saharan Africa. The administration’s approach also affected humanitarian assistance programs, influencing how NGOs operate in conflict zones.

Beyond the three pillars, the Trump administration’s handling of the COVID‑19 pandemic added another layer to its legacy. Early messaging, the push for rapid vaccine development, and the emphasis on reopening the economy created a patchwork of state responses. Health officials and economists still debate the long‑term impact of those choices on public health infrastructure and economic recovery, especially in emerging markets that watch U.S. policy for clues.

All these themes—immigration, tax reform, foreign policy, and pandemic response—intertwine to shape a complex picture of the Trump administration. Below you’ll find a curated collection of articles that dive deeper into each area, offering analysis, data, and on‑the‑ground perspectives that help you understand how this period continues to influence politics, economics, and society today.

Acetaminophen and Autism Claim Stirs Anxiety in US Clinics

A White House statement linking acetaminophen to autism has triggered a wave of concern among parents and clinicians. Doctors across the country report a surge in anxious patients asking about past Tylenol use. The debate spotlights the tension between political messaging and evidence‑based care. Physicians are scrambling to balance reassurance with the need for more research.

View more